http://krusekronicle.typepad.com/kruse_kronicle/2009/06/context-in-communication.html

Here’s an example:

Comps often say that the bible teaches roles for men and women. Okay, this is an opinion, since it cannot be proven. Well, what is the point, scripturaly speaking for saying that? It’s one of the most common things said by comps, yet it cannot be proven.

I don’t get it. And I can prove that the opinion, is one of the most common things said by comps, if anyone wishes for me to do so.

So what’s the point in saying that opinion over and over and over? What does an opinion have to do with actual biblical teachings and boundaries on men and women?

I’ll stop posting for the night.

Signing off *confused*

No one study proves anything, just as no one quote proves anything, but together, we can be careful not to make claims unless we can back them up with something solid—or close to solid, as it were–and have some good discussion as we do so.

So now that I’ve shared some things that Number Two means to me, it’s your turn. What do you understand Number Two to mean?”

Evidence does not necessarily provide solid conclusions/proof. So it is good to back up a claim with evidence, but bottom line, evidence isn’t good enough to safely come to conclusions about anything. Proof positive is what is necessary.

Someone cannot say that _______ is scriptural if they cannot prove it. To me that is fair.

I donno. I’m all for the bottom line of what scripture teaches on men and women and I hope that others here are interested too, comps and egals. I mean why do any of us bother with our beliefs if that’s all they are? So I believe that elephants can drive a bus. So what?

That’s my 2 cents.

Let’s back up our claims with evidence!

If I’m missing something, someone please help me out here.